Research has shown how various types of student subjective well-being are related to positive educational outcomes. Student subjective well-being has been shown to correlate positively with achievement (particularly in primary school students) and feeling accepted and fitting in at school (particularly in secondary school students).
The SSWQ is a 16-item measure for assessing subjective wellbeing of pupils in the school environment. It includes 4 key areas of school life and wellbeing looking deeper into school connectedness and belonging, academic efficacy, joy of learning and educational purpose. School connectedness is linked to levels of anxiety and Emotionally Based School Avoidance (EBSA)
Subscale scores can be used as standalone wellbeing indicators or summed to create a Overall Student Wellbeing composite scale.
The SSWQ is a self-report survey that measures students' positive functioning in the school context. It consists of 16 items, each of which is responded to using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = almost never to 4 = almost always). The total score is calculated by adding up the responses to each item, with higher scores indicating higher levels of subjective wellbeing in the school context.
The SSWQ measures four dimensions of subjective wellbeing: school connectedness, joy of learning, academic efficacy, and educational purpose. Each dimension is made up of four items, and the scores for each dimension are calculated by adding up the responses to those items.
The scoring of the SSWQ will provide schools with valuable information about the subjective wellbeing of their students in the school context. The four dimensions of subjective wellbeing measured by the SSWQ are:
By measuring multiple dimensions of subjective wellbeing, schools can gain a more nuanced understanding of their students' experiences. The scoring will allow schools to identify areas where students are thriving and areas where they may need additional support. For example, if a school has high scores on the joy of learning dimension, they may want to consider incorporating more engaging and interactive teaching methods. On the other hand, if a school has low scores on the school connectedness dimension, they may want to consider implementing programmes to foster a sense of community and belonging among students. By addressing areas of need, schools can create a more positive and supportive school environment, which can lead to better academic outcomes and improved student wellbeing
Schools can use the results of the SSWQ to inform their policies and practices. For example, if a school finds that their students have low levels of academic efficacy, they may want to consider providing additional academic support or resources. Additionally, schools can use the results of the SSWQ to evaluate the effectiveness of their current programmes and interventions. For example, if a school implements a programme to improve school connectedness and sees an increase in scores on that dimension, they can conclude that the programme was effective. Schools can also use the results of the SSWQ to identify students who may be at risk for emotional problems and provide them with appropriate support. By using the results of the SSWQ to inform their practices, schools can create a more positive and supportive school environment, which can lead to better academic outcomes and improved student wellbeing.
This survey is useful for schools because it provides a comprehensive measure of students' subjective wellbeing in the school context. By measuring multiple dimensions of subjective wellbeing, schools can gain a more nuanced understanding of their students' experiences. Additionally, the SSWQ is specifically designed to measure subjective wellbeing in the school context, which makes it a valuable tool for schools. By using the SSWQ, schools can identify areas where their students are thriving and areas where they may need additional support. This can help schools create a more positive and supportive school environment, which can lead to better academic outcomes and improved student wellbeing
The SSWQ takes approximately 40 minutes to complete. The length of the survey is necessary to ensure that all four dimensions of subjective wellbeing are adequately measured. Additionally, the SSWQ has been shown to have good internal consistency and validity, which suggests that it is a reliable and valid measure of subjective wellbeing in the school context.